This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2022, 13, 882–895, doi:10.3762/bjnano.13.79
Figure 1: The characteristic XRD patterns of LaNiO3 at different calcination temperatures.
Figure 2: The characteristic XRD patterns of LaFeO3 at different calcination temperatures.
Figure 3: The characteristic XRD patterns of LaFexNi1−xO3.
Figure 4: The crystal diameters of samples with various Fe/Ni doping ratios.
Figure 5: (a) The DRS spectrum and (b) the pictures of samples with various Fe/Ni doping ratios.
Figure 6: Specific surface area, pore size, and pore volume of the samples with different Fe/Ni ratios.
Figure 7: The FESEM images of LaFexNi1−xO3 prepared at pH 0 (at the magnification of 100,000×).
Figure 8: MB degradation experiments using various LaFexNi1−xO3 with different Fe/Ni ratios prepared at (a) p...
Figure 9: Kinetic analysis of MB degradation experiments using various LaFexNi1−xO3 with different Fe/Ni rati...
Figure 10: (a) The C/C0 and (b) 1st order kinetic analysis of the MB photodegradation using LaFe0.7Ni0.3O3 ope...
Figure 11: (a) The C/C0 and (b) 1st order kinetic analysis of the MB photodegradation using LaFe0.7Ni0.3O3 ope...
Figure 12: (a) The C/C0 and (b) 1st order kinetic analysis of the photodegradation using LaFe0.7Ni0.3O3 operat...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 137–145, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.16
Figure 1: TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of (A) Sa, (B) Sb, (C) Se samples, and corresponding size (diameter) d...
Figure 2: (A–C) UV–vis absorption, excitation and emission spectra, (D–F) fluorescence emission spectra recor...
Figure 3: Fourier transform infrared spectra of Sa, Sb, and Se.
Figure 4: XPS spectra of Sa, Sb, and Se. (A) full scan, (B) high-resolution C 1s XPS spectra, (C) high-resolu...
Figure 5: Symbols written on commercially available filter paper using Sb (5.0 μg mL−1) captured under (A) da...
Figure 6: Cytotoxicity towards the bacteria Xag after incubation with Sb in the concentration range 2.5–20 µg...
Figure 7: Confocal images of Xag. (A) Bright field without Sb, (B) fluorescence mode without Sb and (C) merge...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 686–696, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.69
Figure 1: Schematic of the hexagonal pattern substrate (a) and four different target units: (b) S42; (c) S0:4...
Figure 2: Extinction efficiency spectra of isolated S42 AgNR with AR = 3.5. The black curve corresponds to th...
Figure 3: Extinction, absorption and scattering efficiencies of the four target units with AR = 3.5 and their...
Figure 4: EF distributions obtained from DDA calculations for AgNR 2D hexagonal arrays of different structure...
Figure 5: The average EFs (a) and the total EFs (b) of AgNR 2D hexagonal arrays with different structures and...
Figure 6: The average EFs (a) and the total EFs (b) of S42 AgNR 2D hexagonal arrays with different ARs, illum...
Figure 7: (a) Extinction efficiency spectra of S42 AgNR 2D hexagonal array with AR ranging from 2.0 to 5.0; (...
Figure 8: The angular dependent EFavg of S42 AgNR 2D hexagonal array with AR = 3.5. The excitation wavelength...
Figure 9: The polarization-dependent EFavg (a) and the corresponding absorption (black), scattering (red) and...
Figure 10: The dependence of EFavg on the gap size along the y-direction in S42 AgNR 2D hexagonal array with A...
Figure 11: The dependence of EFavg on the standard deviation of the gap size along the y-direction in the S42 ...
Figure 12: The dependence of EFavg and extinction, absorption and scattering efficiency factors on the diagona...